High-Intensity Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation for Musculoskeletal Pain
Victor Fontes Pacheco, MD*,Giulia Haendchen Fornasari:, MD,Nilza Alveellos Fernandes Neta, MD,Rafael da Costa Serafim, MD,Gabriela Sarturi Barbiero, MD,Diego Cassol Dozza, MD, MSC
Abstract
Background: High-intensity peripheral magnetic stimulation (PMS), delivered as repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) or functional magnetic stimulation (FMS), is increasingly used in rehabilitation, but interpretation is limited by unstable terminology, heterogeneous protocols, and frequent conflation with low-intensity electromagnetic field therapies. Scope: This narrative review synthesizes peer-reviewed orthopedic, rehabilitation, pain, and translational literature on high-intensity PMS for musculoskeletal pain, including randomized trials, meta-analyses, mechanistic studies, feasibility studies, and adjacent evidence. Low-intensity exposure studies, non-musculoskeletal applications, commercial booklets, and non-indexed reports are discussed only to clarify scope, safety, or evidentiary boundaries. Findings: The evidence base comprises several meta-analyses and a set of controlled, mechanistic, pilot, and feasibility studies. In low back pain, pooled estimates suggest short-term pain reduction (SMD -1.16, 95% CI -1.56 to -0.76; very-low GRADE certainty; VAS MD -1.89, 95% CI -3.32 to -0.47; very-low-to-low GRADE certainty) and disability gains (ODI MD -6.55 to -8.39; very-low-to-low GRADE certainty), with partial primary-trial overlap between pooled syntheses. Myofascial trials show short-term analgesic signals at low certainty. Mechanistic studies using fNIRS and TMS suggest cortical reweighting beyond peripheral afferent recruitment and segmental modulation at very-low certainty. Pilot evidence in radicular pain and knee osteoarthritis is promising but not definitive, especially when PMS is tested as an adjunct rather than standalone therapy. Conclusion: High-intensity PMS is a biologically plausible, noninvasive adjunct for selected musculoskeletal pain presentations when paired with rehabilitation that converts transient analgesia into movement and function. Its clinical role depends on adequately powered sham-controlled trials with standardized dose reporting, validated outcomes, durable follow-up, and embedded mechanistic endpoints
Declarations
Conflict of Interest
None
Data Availability
All data are included in the manuscript
AI Tools
AI Tools Used: Generative AI-assisted tools were used for language refinement, formatting support, and reference-organization support. AI tools were not used to generate scientific conclusions, interpret data, or determine certainty ratings. The authors independently reviewed and verified all scientific content, quantitative values, and citations, and take full responsibility for the final manuscript.
Cite This Article
Pacheco VF, Fornasari: GH, Neta NAF, Serafim RdC, Barbiero GS, Dozza DC. High-Intensity Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation for Musculoskeletal Pain. OSCRSJ. 2026;1(1):e0004.
License
This article is published open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. You are free to share and adapt with appropriate credit.
© 2026 The Authors
Corresponding Author
Victor Fontes Pacheco, MD
Pain and Regenerative Medicine Group, Federal University of São Paulo, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil Chairman, Scientific Director and Founding Partner, PACTO, Patient Care, Academic Research, Clinical Knowledge and Teaching in Orthobiologics, São Paulo, Brazil Chairman and Board Member, WIRM, World Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Brazilian Chapter, Brazil Technical and Scientific Director, Attending Physician, Researcher and Professor, Instituto RegeneraDOR, Center for Treatment, Education and Research in Pain and Regenerative Medicine, São Paulo, Brazi
ORCID: 0009-0006-5537-7050